Candy Claw Machine.com

to potential pro-American U.S. criticism

What to Know and critics of American policy in order not to be suspected to pursue ideological fundamental opposition .

international law. Protokolonisatorisch. Missionary. The front of the opposition against the current policies of the Bush administration goes through all age groups and walks of life. The debate sparked by the known issue - Iraq, Guantánamo, Kyoto keywords - and is expressed in a fundamental rejection of the current administration, which changes too often in mindless anti-Americanism. Remarkably, this caught especially by those who fancy themselves enlightened and open.

The dangers that lie in the demonization of the United States are not largely perceived. However: It is clear that anti-Americanism - as any other fundamentalism - is not effective. Rather, it legitimizes legitimate criticism. Mental fundamental opposition to U.S. positions is not conducive to the personal knowledge horizon. Only non-ideological, factually correct and legally sound criticism should be accepted.

can be laid on two points make the criticism of the imperial ambitions of the United States and the American interest policy. In fact the U.S. is often accused of being a hegemonic power with imperialist ambitions. It is true that America, in terms of its cultural and economic influence, its military and political power, in the tradition of the great empires of yesteryear is. The U.S. is undoubtedly describe as hegemon. However, this primary is a fixed position and can not in itself a reproach to be. Who much power has, has an effect. Missed, it is also, designating the United States as an empire in the classic sense. While traditional (marked by colonizing efforts) empires strive to maximize their territory, America is limited to an enlargement of his actual influence. Iraq as the 51st to affiliate to the state want to take, the United States even their biggest critics is not available.

is particularly virulent criticism of the group politics of the United States. The accusation that the U.S. is pursuing primarily their own interests, by pointing out counter that it is legitimate, of course, that states (primary) pursue their own interests. The U.S., however, suffer the 'tragedy of the superpower': the major role in the international community yielding American unilateral action sequences far more important than a strict monitoring of autonomous interests of small and medium-sized states.

Still an Evil Empire? initiate

While the U.S. is not a new phase of imperialism and autonomous pursuit of interest is the right of any state, the Bush administration, with reference to which it applied to the assessment of international Law major accusations are made which entitle to entitle the U.S. to track, as Evil Empire. releviert are criticizing in particular, the international illegality of the action in Iraq, the treatment of prisoners, illegal combatants 'at Guantanamo and other prisons, outsourced' information acquisition and the transfer of prisoners from Iraq to other countries. At this point very clearly to make one thing clear: there is no excuse for torture. Torture, which is exercised by a State or not prevented, constitutes a breach of international obligations of this State dar. The denial of a detention review is extremely problematic. All of this is controversial among experts in international law and in essence was and is taken up by U.S. courts.

In view of the behavior of the Bush administration should also be noted that it is unacceptable to ignore international legal obligations. A one-sided relativization of multilaterally developed, based on legal international order is prohibited. The treatment of part of the prisoners in the War on Terror 'can not be reconciled with the law. With respect to many current developments in international law, such as the International Criminal Court, the Kyoto process and the Ottawa Convention against land mines, the U.S. lags behind public opinion. To end this deliberate distancing is easy. It only takes a fact-wing political will formation.

have in formulating their policies for the next time to consider the U.S. that the phrase "The strong man is strongest alone," the Wilhelm Tell by Schiller in his mouth was set, in the globalized and networked world of today no longer has the same authority as in times of Rütli oath. America is rethinking and thus be guided by the decision again concentrating on the international community must, critics are however, a duty to reflect on the facts and let the ideological arrow in the quiver.